On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 05:52:14PM -0700, Jarrod Frates wrote: > According to the Supreme Court decision in Calder v. Bull (1798), the > ex post facto prohibition applies only to criminal law, not civil law.
Thanks for providing this and the subsequent explanation. I haven't read that decision yet -- but I will now. It seems to provide a lot of the context necessary to understand this issue, so I'm grateful for the pointer. ---Rsk _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
