Sure. Actually, I think that's the point. Clearly, the terms of engagement are a bit too ambiguous for comfort.
-- David Harley, ESET Research Author AVIEN COO: http://www.avien.org http://www.smallblue-greenworld.co.uk > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard M. Smith > Sent: 02 July 2008 17:29 > To: 'FunSec [List]' > Subject: Re: [funsec] I suppose it is a fake thing or a > misunderstanding :? > > Correct. But some of these tasks might show up in almost any > business if a crime has occurred. For example, I know a few > examples of the technical staff of software development > companies doing research to support software piracy investigations. > > Richard > > -----Original Message----- > From: David Harley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 12:25 PM > To: 'Richard M. Smith'; 'FunSec [List]' > Subject: RE: [funsec] I suppose it is a fake thing or a > misunderstanding :? > > > I don't see it. Which clause do you think applies? > > I don't suppose Larry was suggesting that these clauses > really apply. But I can see how many tasks I remember being > set during my time in support might have been seen as falling > into one or more of these categories. > > -- > David Harley, ESET Research Author > AVIEN COO: http://www.avien.org > http://www.smallblue-greenworld.co.uk > > > > _______________________________________________ > Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. > https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec > Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list. _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
