> From: "Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [email protected], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 16:50:05 -0800 > Subject: [Spam-R] Pure 419 > > It's good to know that the 419 scammers are concerned that we not get infected ...
This one is reputedly from India not Nigeria... (sify.com is reportedly in Chennai,Tamil Nadu, India...) > > > Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Received: from 41.219.229.165 > (SquirrelMail authenticated user [EMAIL PROTECTED]) > by webmail.mol.go.th with HTTP; > Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:51:51 +0700 (ICT) > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:51:51 +0700 (ICT) > Subject: [MALWARE FREE]Good Day > From: "Thomas Walford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.5 > X-BitDefender-Scanner: Clean, Agent: BitDefender qmail 2.1.0 on > mail.mol.go.th, sigver: 7.20190 > X-BitDefender-Spam: No (248) > X-BitDefender-SpamStamp: v1, build 2.5.34.49691, bayes score: 500, > pbayes score: 248(248), neunet score: 500, total: 248 > X-DSPAM-Result: Spam > > I am Thomas Walford, staff of SG International Private Bank. I am > contacting you concerning a deceased customer and an investment he > placed under our banks management three years ago. > > I am contacting you independently of our investigation and no one is > informed of this communication. I would like to intimate you with certain > facts that I believe would be of interest to you. In the year 2004, the > subject matter; came to our bank to engage in business discussions with > our private banking division. He informed us that he had a financial > portfolio of Six Million United States Dollars, which he wished to have us > turn over (invest) on his behalf. > > In mid 2005, he asked that the money be liquidated because he needed to > make an urgent investment requiring cash payments in Helsinki- Finland. He > directed that I liquidate the funds and deposit it with a security firm. I > informed him that my Bank would have to make special arrangements to have > this done and in order not to circumvent due process. > > Cash movement across boarders has become especially strict since the > incidents of 9/11. I contacted my affiliate and made the funds available > to the security firm. I undertook all the processes and made sure I > followed his precise instructions to the letter and had the funds > deposited with the security firm. > The Security Firm is a specialist private firm that accepts deposits from > high net worth individuals and blue chip corporations that handle valuable > products or undertake transactions that need immediate access to cash. > This small and highly private organization is familiar especially to the > highly placed and well-connected organizations. In line with instructions, > the money was deposited with the security firm. > > The deceased told me he wanted the money there in anticipation of his > arrival from Norway later that week. This was the last communication we > had, this transpired around 25th of November 2005. In June last year, and > we got a call from the security firm informing us about the inactivity of > that particular portfolio. I made futile efforts to locate the deceased. > I immediately passed the task of locating him to the internal > investigations department of SG International Private Bank. Four days > later, information started to trickle in, apparently our client was dead. > > A person who suited his description was declared dead of a heart attack in > Canne, in Southern part of France. We were soon enough to identify the > body and cause of death was confirmed. In his bio-data form, he listed no > next of kin. In the field of private banking, opening an account with us > means no one will know of its existence, accounts are rarely held under a > name; depositors use numbers and codes to make the accounts anonymous. > This investigation has for the past months been unfruitful; we've used our > private investigation affiliate companies to get to the root of the > problem. It is this investigation that resulted in my being furnished with > your details as a possible relative of the deceased. > > What I wish to relate to you will smack of unethical practice but I want > you to understand something. It is only an outsider to the banking world > who finds the internal politics of the banking world aberrational. The > world of private banking especially is fraught with huge rewards for those > that occupy certain offices and oversee certain portfolios. You should > have begun by now to put together the general direction of what I propose. > There is Six Million United States dollars deposited in a security firm, I > alone have the deposit details and they will release the deposit to no one > unless I instruct them to do so. > > I alone know of the existence of this deposit for as far as my Bank is > concerned. > My proposal: I now seek your permission to present you as a next of kin to > the deceased, as all documentations will be carefully worked to make you > the beneficiary to the funds $6,00 000 00 (Six Million United states > Dollar); I am prepared to place you in a position to instruct The security > Firm to release the deposit to you as the closest surviving relation. > Upon receipt of the deposit, I am prepared to share the proceeds 60/40.I > would have gone ahead to ask that the funds be released to me, but that > would have drawn a straight line to me and my involvement in claiming the > deposit. We can fine-tune this based on our interactions am aware of the > consequences of this proposal. I ask that if you find no interest in this > project that you should discard this mail. I ask that you do not be > vindictive and destructive. If my offer is of no appeal to you, delete > this message and forget I ever contacted you. > > I wish to inform you that should you contact me via official channels; I > will deny knowing you and about this project. I repeat, I do not want you > contacting me through my official phone lines nor do I want you contacting > me through my official email account. Contact me only through the numbers > I will provide for you and also through this email address. I do not want > any direct link between you and myself. My official lines are not secured > lines as they are periodically monitored to assess our level of customer > care in line with our Total Quality Management Policy. > > Please observe this instruction religiously. Do not betray my confidence. > Kindly send your response to my private email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I await your response. > > Thomas Walford > > -- > This mail was scanned by BitDefender > For more informations please visit http://www.bitdefender.com > > > ====================== (quote inserted randomly by Pegasus Mailer) > [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] > If you can't say anything good about someone, sit right here by > me. - Alice Roosevelt Longworth > http://victoria.tc.ca/techrev/rms.htm > _______________________________________________ > Spam Research mailing list > https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/spam > Notice: Spam Research is an open and public mailing list. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Gregory Hicks | Principal Systems Engineer Cadence Design Systems | Direct: 408.576.3609 555 River Oaks Pkwy M/S 9B1 San Jose, CA 95134 I am perfectly capable of learning from my mistakes. I will surely learn a great deal today. "A democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding on what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the results of the decision." "The best we can hope for concerning the people at large is that they be properly armed." --Alexander Hamilton _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
