Just heard from Bandcon. They claim they have also stopped routing for Intercage/Atrivo, but for whatever reason the route tables don't reflect that yet b/c of some problem with their routers. Anyway, it appears now that WVFiber is the only one keeping Atrivo on the Web, and they're set to cut them off by Thurs. at the latest.
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 8:55 AM, Matt Jonkman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Definitely (finally) a mark in the win column for the good guys!!! > > Matt > > Paul Ferguson wrote: > > Brian Krebs add some late updates to his "Security Fix" article > > from Friday 5 September 2008: > > > > [snip] > > > > Update, Sunday, Sept. 7, 8:02 p.m.: I spoke today with Randy Epstein, > > president of WVFiber and co-founder of Host.net, which acquired WVFiber > > just six weeks ago. Epstein said after reading reports from Security Fix, > > Hostexploit.com, Spamhaus.org and others about cyber crime activities at > > Atrivo, WVFiber has decided to drop Atrivo as a customer. WVFiber plans > to > > stop providing upstream connectivity to Atrivo by Wednesday or Thursday > at > > the latest, Epstein said. That would leave Atrivo with just a single > > upstream provider -- Bandcon. > > > > Update, Sunday, Sept. 7, 9:15 p.m.: nLayer Communications, a company that > > owns a significant slice of the Internet addresses used by > > Atrivo/Intercage, is demanding that Atrivo vacate the space and return > the > > addresses by Sept 30. > > > > "Atrivo/Intercage has not been a direct customer of nLayer Communications > > since December 2007, but they still have some legacy reallocations from > our > > IP space," wrote nLayer co-founder Richard A. Steenbergen, in an e-mail > to > > Security Fix. "Since they are no longer a customer, we require that they > > return our non-portable IP space, and have given them a deadline of > > September 30th to do so. If the IP space is not returned by that point, > we > > will follow standard procedure to reclaim it, including null routing the > > space, and sending cease and desist letters to any network who still > > transits it without our permission." > > > > According to Steenbergen, Atrivo/Intercage must return roughly 7,400 IP > > addresses. > > > > [snip] > > > > Ref: > > > http://voices.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2008/09/scam-heavy_us_isp_grow > > s_more_i.html > > > > FYI, > > > > - ferg > > > > -- > "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson > Engineering Architecture for the Internet > fergdawg(at)netzero.net > ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. > https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec > Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list. > > -- > -------------------------------------------- > Matthew Jonkman > Emerging Threats > Phone 765-429-0398 > Fax 312-264-0205 > http://www.emergingthreats.net > -------------------------------------------- > > PGP: http://www.jonkmans.com/mattjonkman.asc > > > _______________________________________________ > Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. > https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec > Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list. >
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
