Wow! I am uterly shocked.
> ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 07:22:10 -0700 > From: Robert Slade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [funsec] T33n pr0n ch!ldren > To: [email protected] > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > OK, now that I have your attention ... (If that got by spam filters ...) > > This is about children taking pictures of themselves. It's also about who > is responsible for the wrongness of an act. It's also about age of > responsibility, although I'm not sure I want to get into a Carleton U > discussion ... > > http://www.khou.com/news/state/stories/khou081008_ar_porntext.f31234e3.html > > http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=2833 > > [snip] > > ====================== > [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] > "If you do buy a computer, don't turn it on." - Richards' 2nd Law > ============= for back issues: > [Base URL] site http://victoria.tc.ca/techrev/ > CISSP refs: [Base URL]mnbksccd.htm > Security Dict.: [Base URL]secgloss.htm > Security Educ.: [Base URL]comseced.htm > Book reviews: [Base URL]mnbk.htm > [Base URL]review.htm > Partial/recent: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/techbooks/ > Security Educ.: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/comseced/ > Review mailing list: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > ------------------------------ > > There must be more to this then we are being told. Perhaps the girl's parents are behind this stating the boy "made" the girl take the picture. Or, did the boy pimp the picture. There can not be any law enforcement agency this naive. Or, for that matter, school officials. It's so simple: 1. girl sends pic 2. boy gets message 3. boy opens message. Now, what did boy do with it from there? did he "show" it around? Therefore he distributes porno? That must be the case. -- Big R
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
