If was just for an 'executive' over view, it too much technical detail. Most 'in' the security field knew most of this. We have all been discussing it for a while.
But yes, not knowing the intended audience does hamper my opinion. Although the way it was talked up before release implied that they would have something wonderful at *our* level, and that was not the case. Richard Paul Ferguson wrote: > Can you explain to me exactly _who_ already knows this? > > You? Yes. Me? Yes. > > Anybody else? :-) > > - ferg > > > On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 7:39 PM, freed0 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Sorry, it is very pretty and adds absolutely no value to what we already >> know. It >> is a lot of very basic effort that could have been generated in the first >> days of >> the 'attacks' What is the target audience supposed to be? >> >> >> Richard >> >> Paul Ferguson wrote: >>> FYI: >>> >>> http://intelfusion.net/wordpress/?p=432 >>> >>> - ferg >>> > > > _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
