You grossly overestimate the effectiveness of air power and other weapons designed for use against mechanized forces in the field against an insurgency.
Aks, ARs, Garands, and any semi-auto handgun would be very effective in any revolution. >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >On Behalf Of Drsolly >Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 4:02 PM >To: quispiam lepidus >Cc: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [funsec] UK: Passports Will Be Needed to Buy Mobile Phones > >You would if your opponent had artillery, jet fighters, napalm and >fuel-air bombs. > >US subjects are only allowed to own weapons that they could never use to >make a revolution. All you can do with your popguns is kill other >civilians. > >On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, quispiam lepidus wrote: > >> I guess our definition of "popgun" must differ substantially, I'd >> hardly consider an AK-47 a "popgun". >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 7:54 AM, Drsolly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Or in the USA, actually. They don't allow US subjects to own any >> > substantial weaponry, only popguns. >> > >_______________________________________________ >Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. >https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec >Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list. _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
