On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 07:19:00PM -0800, Paul Ferguson quoted: > On Monday, Security Fix contacted the Internet providers that manage more > than 90 percent of the company's connection to the larger Internet, > sending them information about badness at McColo as documented by the
And that's the most interesting part of the story. Clearly, many of us "out here" could see that McColo, like Atrivo/Intercage, was a major source of badness. Why couldn't the providers servicing them -- who quite obviously had access to far more data than any of us -- see the same thing? What conclusion should we draw from their failure to act in a timely and professional manner, long before a WaPost reporter got involved? ---Rsk _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
