[email protected] wrote: > On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:07:54 +0900, Peter Evans said: >> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 06:19:25PM -0800, Rob Thompson wrote: >>> Peter Evans wrote: >>>> Well, I wonder if it is as anal as vista (which I have, but >>>> to be quite honest, can't be arsed to install) about HDCP and >>>> content encraption. >> >>> It would be a safe assumption that it will be worse. Remember, >>> Micro$oft was the fine group that force Palladium down our throats. But >>> to be fair, we all know what can be said about assumptions. >> Ah, but Palladium stops spam! >> >> All I can find though, is FUD though. Does it really exist? > > Many systems now include a TPM chipset. That's about all that's *really* > happened. Most of the rest evaporated when it became clear that consumers > really prefer their media without insane DRM attached to it (except for > all the Vista DRM stuff that still ended up in there anyhow). >
I guess I should have read up one more message before my other response. What Valdis said... ;p > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. > https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec > Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list. -- Rob +-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-+ | _ | | ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) | | - against HTML email X | | / \ | | | +-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-+ _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
