> For me, at least, that last bit is the real issue -- the > transit path "collateral damage" issues, not the creation of > a pseudo-botnet and the consent of Prevx.
That's certainly of interest, but I don't think it was a "pseudo-botnet": pseudo-spam and pseudo-DDoS, perhaps, but the botnet was, to all accounts, the real thing. -- David Harley BA CISSP FBCS CITP Small Blue-Green World _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
