Jon O. wrote: > On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 04:37:51AM +0300, Gadi Evron wrote: >> Gadi Evron wrote:
>> Better search string: >> http://search.twitter.com/search?q=conficker+OR+%23conficker > > Uh, so I'm not so worried about conficker -- I'm a bit more worried > about the security experts (yes, you on this list) looking at twitter > to find out the latest info ;). Do you really think that's a useful > source? > > General user: "Yo, security person, what's up with conficker is it going > to kick some ass or what?" > > Security person: Uh, hold on, I need to refresh my twitter and I'll get > back to you... > > Granted, I don't have an infected bot sitting in a honeynet waiting to get > a payload, but I'm damn sure someone who does will come out blazing with > info on all channels when they see something interesting. We don't get out latest tech data on twitter, dude. _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
