>> I know someone who until recently (~1yr ago?) was running Windows 3.1. For all its lack of inherent security, it was substantially stronger against today's carpet-bombed attacks than lots of more modern stuff, simply because most malware wouldn't run on it at all.
Facinating. Think of how secure DOS and CP/M are by this standard. Larry Seltzer eWEEK.com Security Center Editor http://security.eweek.com/ http://blogs.pcmag.com/securitywatch/ Contributing Editor, PC Magazine [email protected] _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
