Promise? > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Adriel T. Desautels > Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 1:30 PM > To: Larry Seltzer > Cc: funsec > Subject: Re: [funsec] When they outlaw deep packet inspection... > > This is just an example of someone trying to do something about > something that they know nothing about. It won't work, mark my words. > If I'm wrong I'll eat my socks on youtube. :) > > > On Apr 24, 2009, at 6:37 AM, Larry Seltzer wrote: > > > http://blog.wired.com/business/2009/04/netonline-priva.html > > > > "...[Congressman Rick] Boucher made it clear he's concerned about ISPs > > using so-called deep packet inspection technology, or DPI, to > > examine the data packets it delivers to and from its customers." > > > > How far can this go? Does Bayesian analysis violate privacy of > > spammers? > > > > Larry Seltzer > > eWEEK.com Security Center Editor > > http://security.eweek.com/ > > http://blogs.pcmag.com/securitywatch/ > > Contributing Editor, PC Magazine > > [email protected] > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. > > https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec > > Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list. > > > > Adriel T. Desautels > [email protected] > -------------------------------------- > > Subscribe to our blog > http://snosoft.blogspot.com > > > _______________________________________________ > Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. > https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec > Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
