On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 05:10:52PM -0700, Alex Lanstein wrote: > I bet if you had asked the typical American after 9/11 if they would install > an agent on their computer to attack the [insert racial slur here], the > percent who wholeheartedly obliged probably would've approached 100
Keep in mind, please, as long as you've mentioned 9/11, that this is the same hapless troop of baboons which failed to defend *its own headquarters* from a single, lumbering, slow, un-stealthy, un-armed civilian airliner flown by barely-trained amateurs, clearly visible on radar, with obvious intent, and inbound with plenty of warning. Moreover, this obvious and total failure came well *after* many years of assurances that they were quite prepared to defend against a serious attack -- that is, one conducted with fast, maneuverable, stealthy, heavily-armed aircraft flown by experienced combat pilots and directed against multiple targets. Of course, if you ask "the typical American" about this, they will utterly fail to grasp its tactical and strategic significance. ---Rsk _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
