This is a bit of an overreaction. Anyone on this list gets an inquiry  
from someone they're wondering about, ping me privately. There's some  
good eggs out there.



On Jul 15, 2009, at 2:30 PM, "Tomas L. Byrnes" <[email protected]> wrote:

> I only speak to writers for IEEE technical publications, at peer
> conferences, write my own pieces, or do first-person, live  
> interviews on
> TV for this reason.
>
> "Clear writers assume, with a pessimism born of experience, that
> whatever
> isn't plainly stated the reader will invariably misconstrue." - John  
> R.
> Trimble
>
> I guess a modern paraphrase would be:
>
> "Clear speakers assume, with a pessimism born of experience, that
> whatever
> Can be twisted and misconstrued will invariably be so."
>
> Journalist:(n) One without the literary talent or credibility to write
> their own prose or be believed on their own, but the ability to twist
> others' beyond comprehension to suit their purposes.
>
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected] [mailto:funsec- 
>> [email protected]]
>> On Behalf Of Gadi Evron
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 10:42 PM
>> To: funsec
>> Subject: Re: [funsec] press trickery of the worst kind
>>
>> Update:
>> Mr. Harris sent me an email stating he sent in a correction
>> recommendation. Let's see what happens with it.
>>
>>
>>
>> Gadi Evron wrote:
>>> I spoke yesterday with one David Harris--I shouldn't have. He is a
>>> reporter for a Chinese publication and was writing a story on "cyber
>>> war" in the middle east. He was referenced by a friend so I was  
>>> happy
>> to
>>> help him.
>>>
>>> I mentioned how whenever there are political and ethnic
>>> tensions--anywhere, cyber after-math follows. This often consists of
>>> silliness such as kids attacking with defacement and DDoS attacks. I
>>> also mentioned "warfare" is buzzword, hyped, over-kill which
> shouldn't
>>> be used lightly.
>>>
>>> At no point did I speak of Israel as a state. I told the reporter
> that
>> I
>>> don't work for the Israeli government these days and that I can't
>>> comment anyway as I know nothing about what Israel does or doesn't
> do.
>>>
>>> Here is what he wrote:
>>>
>>>    "Gadi Evron, a private consultant formerly responsible for
>> security in
>>> Israeli government's non-military computer system, does not deny  
>>> that
>>> his country has a large-scale activity using the Internet to disrupt
>>> enemy activities. He just tends to err when it comes to talk of the
>> more
>>> grandiose plots. "
>>>
>>> Even if I forgive him for calling me a consultant...
>>> I called the guy, and he said: "well, you did not deny it".
>>>
>>> Of course I did not deny it, how can I deny something I know nothing
>>> about? He may as well have said I didn't deny the Roswell landing  
>>> and
>>> alien abductions.
>>>
>>> Immediately after what is referenced to me without quoting, he  
>>> puts a
>>> quote which claims this even more vehemently. He then attributed it
> to
>>> someone else at the end of the paragraph almost as an after-thought:
>>>
>>>     "While it is clear Israel has successfully used cyber-tactics
>>> against its enemies, it is harder to know to what extent Israel has
>> been
>>> hit, according to Dahan. "
>>>
>>> I don't know where Dahan comes up with his facts, but I my alarm
> bells
>>> should have ringed when the repoter, Mr. Harris, asked me about  
>>> silly
>>> rumored conspiracy theories against the US government--they were so
>>> ridiculous I don't even remember what they were.
>>>
>>> Was this reporter just looking for a hit story, no matter if
>>> unsubstantiated and unprofessional, or is this some sort of agenda?
>>>
>>> This is trickery of the lowest sort, and yellow journalism if I've
>> ever
>>> seen such. Unless it was an honest mistake on the reporter's part-- 
>>> in
>>> which case I hope this is fixed soon.
>>>
>>> You can find his article, here:
>>> http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2009-07/15/content_11709201.htm
>>>
>>>    Gadi.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Gadi Evron,
>> [email protected].
>>
>> Blog: http://gevron.livejournal.com/
>> _______________________________________________
>> Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
>> https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
>> Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
> https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
> Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.

Reply via email to