> Its not nice, but "terrorist". I think we use this word too easily.
This is exactly what some voices of caution were saying would happen to the anti-terrorist laws: they would get (mis)applied to things bearing no relation to what they were put in place to combat. This was not a terrorist threat - except according to the definition in a particular law. A sane jurisdiction would take this as reason to fix the law. (Actually, a sane jurisdiction would not have enacted it in the first place.) The real wonder, to me, is that more people who can relatively easily flee the USA aren't. /~\ The ASCII Mouse \ / Ribbon Campaign X Against HTML [email protected] / \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
