[email protected] wrote: > From: Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah <[email protected]> > Date: Tuesday, August 11, 2009, 3:48 PM > >> (Aside from the prettier background?) > > I would say that the background of Bing is Fail #1. Google has aced this > topic in a way that cannot be surmounted: you can't unclutter blank. The > calming whiteness of Google is the "Don't Panic!" sticker for the Internet, > marginally lowering the blood pressure of millions of frustrated noobs and > frazzled old timers. By adding color and pictures of near-sighted yaks, Bing > hasn't done anything to make things simpler. > > As for how well it works, I don't know. I'm generally a demonstration of > Newton's conclusion about bodies at rest, and Google isn't not working for me > yet.
You aren't missing anything. They just couldn't leave well enough alone and had to get their hands in the cookie jar too, with a flashy product that at best gives mediocre results. It's like the Vista of search engines... I gave it a whirl and IMO it's no better than Hotbox or Ask.com. I'm sticking with Google. > > -chris > > > > _______________________________________________ > Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. > https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec > Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list. > -- Rob +-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-+ | _ | | ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) | | - against HTML email X | | / \ | | | +-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-+ _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
