On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:49:02 -0400, Ali, Saqib <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Traditional IT does that by constructing fool-proof procedures. >> That's very, very difficult, because fools are so ingenious. ;-) > > I think we have all worked on the never-ending projects that involved > making the applications "user-proof". It is simply not possible.... Yeah, what's that line about the most secure system on the planet? Sealed in an impregnable Faraday-cage vault, not connected to the outside world in any way, not accessible to anyone? What's the most-secure (by that standard) system y'all have had access to? Mine's pretty mundane, being a plain ol' server room that you had to badge into separately from badging into the building. It did have a webcam up in one corner of the room that was visible to anyone on the company intranet, though. I guess that was to discourage you from doing anything you wouldn't want someone else to see (such as ... taking a fire-axe to a rack of fileservers?). Thankfully the stream was only 320x240, with a low frame rate, so carefully watching people log in was mostly out of the question. -- Paul _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
