der Mouse wrote: > significant, is not all that good - certainly not enough to rate "very > effective". Perhaps I'm just behind the times, but in view of the
I call the claimed 60% better chances of not attracting a disease very effective. Here is a better URL: http://www.nydailynews.com/lifestyle/health/2009/08/25/2009-08-25_cdc_mulls_routine_circumcision_of_infants_to_reduce_spread_of_hiv.html Gadi. _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
