Calling these "blunders" is a bit misleading; they're pretty much all
instances of vandalism. And most instances of vandalism are fixed very
very quickly (within minutes or better).
It would be more interesting to see a list of untruths that persisted for
(say) longer than a day. And to see some analysis of which were
successful vandalism and which were something else. Otherwise, "Wikipedia
has at various instants contained false statements!" really isn't all that
interesting, and doesn't really tell us much...
DC
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
