On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 08:09:46PM -0500, John Bambenek wrote: > International law is not real law.
That's a novel argument. Utterly without merit, but novel. You might recall that it was not all that long ago that a number of nations, including the US, participated in the application of international law in a number of cases -- some of which concerned individuals with minor roles, and some of which concerned individuals largely responsible for decision-making. While there is still considerable debate about the merits of prosecuting the former, there is widespread consensus that pursuing the latter was, and is, necessary. And perhaps more importantly, there is no serious disagreement (except among the uninformed and the willfully ignorant [1]) that a valid legal framework existed and exists for those actions. The law is not the issue here. The issue is our national cowardice in refusing to admit that we did some of the same things that we (and our allies) prosecuted and (in some cases) executed other people for doing. ---Rsk [1] Well, and perhaps the lunatics who rant about "world government" and other artifacts of their delusional paranoia. Such people may safely be ignored when not being mocked for amusement value. _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
