David Lodge wrote: > [1] I think we should set up some sort of cookie/LSO bank: everybody puts > on a marketing cookie with the same UID, mess up the marketing figures > summat rotten :-)
I've wondered in the past about the feasability of doing this for ordinary browser cookies for those sites where _you_ do not "need" personal identification and may not be comfortable with the back-end data aggregation that is otherwise collected on you. For example, if everyone who likes, say, 50 results/page, all language results, no filtering and no query suggestions (i.e. prefers their own previous matching searches to appear) in Google (and perhaps uses no other Google services that require login) were to share one set of Google cookies, etc, etc across other sets of preferences, Google's accumulated "search intelligence" would be watered down and your privacy would be improved. Yes, I know you can nuke cookies between sessions or more often as suits your personal tastes, but then you have to go and reset several settings at Google to get it working usefully, rather than the ugly defaults. A "cookie sharing" service to give you a cookie associated with your preferred settings, etc (depending on the site -- I'm just using Google as an example here) would somewhat further anonymize you and mess with the market value of the data collected behind your back. Regards, Nick FitzGerald _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
