der Mouse wrote: >>>> "An operating system" in general may or may not be [split into >>>> core, GUI, and CLI]; indeed, plenty of operating systems do not >>>> have anything at all that could reasonably be called a GUI, much >>>> less structure like what you sketch. >> 1) Either convince me that Cisco's IOS and Juniper's JunOS are in >> fact *not* operating systems, or point out to me how they're split >> into a core, a CLI, and a GUI. > > You don't need to go even that far. Just consider NetBSD (or Linux, or > whatever) on hardware without a GUI-capable framebuffer - or, if that's > not enough, on hardware which can't be given one (I've got a board from > Mesanet on which it would be difficult-to-impossible to add GUI-capable > hardware).
We're talking about Mac here, right? > > /~\ The ASCII Mouse > \ / Ribbon Campaign > X Against HTML [email protected] > / \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B > _______________________________________________ > Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. > https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec > Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list. > -- Gadi Evron, [email protected]. Blog: http://gevron.livejournal.com/ _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
