http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/oct/07/cctv-surveillance-internet

So these three guys - two IT professionals and a former restaurateur - have 
this idea. There are 4.2m CCTV cameras in Britain, they say to themselves, 
except only one in a thousand is being watched at any one time, because manning 
them all would cost too much. The average Brit is filmed 300 times a day, yet 
overall crime <http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/ukcrime>  rates are rising and 
conviction rates are down (their assertions, by the way).

But what if the whole nation - heck, why not the world? - were to be monitoring 
those cameras? What if you streamed them on to a website, and offered internet 
users a cash reward whenever they spotted a crime? You could charge the camera 
owners £20 a week per camera to have their feed included: loads cheaper than 
spending hours trawling through footage to see who nicked what. Brilliant, no?

Tony Morgan, James Woodward and David Steele plainly reckon so. They've sunk, 
one imagines, a tidy sum into Internet Eyes. There's the software, a website, a 
Facebook page, a press release. The scheme is currently trialling in 
Stratford-upon-Avon with an undisclosed number of shops and businesses 
(although as yet neither the police nor the local authority, who are 
diplomatically declining all comment), and will go live nationwide next month.

Registered surfers will compete for up to £1,000 a month, collecting points by 
watching a selection of anonymous cameras and clicking a button whenever they 
see something suspicious. The click will send an SMS and a still image to the 
camera operator, who decides whether to do anything about it. (You can lose 
points for sending a false alarm.) Says Morgan, who insists this is "not a game 
- these are not prizes, they're rewards for spotting crime", Internet Eyes 
"could turn out to be the best crime-prevention weapon there's ever been". 
What's not to love?

Um, quite a bit. The civil liberties people are up in arms, obviously. Even 
Michael Laurie, head of Crimestoppers, foresees a "wide range of opportunities 
for abuse and error" in what is, for him, "essentially no more than a 
commercial venture exploiting some people's baser characteristics". And while 
Morgan is confident his scheme complies with the Data Protection Act, the 
assistant information commissioner, Jonathan Bamford, is not so sure.

 

 

Alex Eckelberry, CEO 
Sunbelt Software
33 N. Garden Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33755 p: 727-562-0101 x220 
e: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>  MSN: 
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>  
w: www.sunbeltsoftware.com <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com>  b: 
www.sunbeltblog.com <http://www.sunbeltblog.com> 

 

 

_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.

Reply via email to