Who wants the job? The pay is like 120K year, anyone worth their salt just won't go for it. also the 2 year no lobing after you quit. Your not going to get the best candidates...
-rick Larry Seltzer wrote: >> Is it me or is the new Whitehouse cyber security document just b/s of >> more cooperation yet again? > > I for one am reassured and inspired. The Bush administration was > incapable of making so attractive a document. What was it supposed to be > about again? > > In a recent CircleID > (http://www.circleid.com/posts/20091104_the_role_of_a_cybersecurity_czar > /) Steven Bellovin talked about why it's taking the administration so > long to appoint a cyber czar. I pointed out in a comment that we have > Obama to thank for raising expectations for government leadership in > this area and that he had specifically promised to appoint such an > advisor reporting directly to him and that he would make computer > security the high priority issue it needed to be. > > Obviously these were as insincere as most of his campaign promises. The > Bush administration made several low-profile efforts at these problems > with, to my knowledge, no real success. As with Afghanistan, Obama is > finding out that solutions that will work and gain political acceptance > in the real world aren't as simple as his very clear campaign promises. > > Larry Seltzer > Contributing Editor, PC Magazine > [email protected] > http://blogs.pcmag.com/securitywatch/ > > _______________________________________________ > Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. > https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec > Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list. _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
