On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 02:02:14PM -0800, [email protected] wrote: > My guess is that the rate of discovery for existing > infections/compromises is meager, at best. Whatever number you could > find I would inherently assume is at best half as bad as the situation > really is. Most people are not equipped to determine that they have > been infected at all, and as long as the lights keep blinking - even > at a faster rate than legitimate usage would dictate - they aren't even > going to look (don't make me invoke Heartland again).
I have to concur with this. I say "have to" because I'd really like to disagree, but all available evidence suggests that Chris' assessment is spot-on. Dammit, could you be less depressingly correct on a Monday morning? ;-) ---Rsk _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
