Oh come on, you didn't actually believe that, did you? Nobody builds something *that* useful to LE and gives it an off switch.
The call center guy screwed up, they made up a convenient story, we all go on our merry way. On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Alex Eckelberry <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm not so sure. While I empathize with the mother, Onstar does have a > point--they can't reactivate the Onstar system without someone pressing > the "Blue button". > > A software design/architecture issue, which could undoubtedly be fixed > going forward. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Markos Grokus > Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 3:53 AM > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [funsec] Onstar - throwing the baby out with the bath water > > What a ridiculous state of affairs :( > > > > Dan White wrote: >> <security content="mild"> >> >> http://tinyurl.com/yf7hq82 >> >> I'm left wondering if anybody bothered to get the poor girl out of the > car before >> they replaced it. >> > _______________________________________________ > Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. > https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec > Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list. > > _______________________________________________ > Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. > https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec > Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list. > _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
