Funsec has hit its peak of inflated expectations and certainly hit its plateau of productivity, due to that we have decided to relegate Funsec to the newly created "Jesters Quadrant".
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Alex Eckelberry Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 3:03 PM To: Larry Seltzer; Michael Graham; [email protected] Subject: Re: [funsec] Rethinking FUNSEC You're working for Gartner now? From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Larry Seltzer Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 4:54 PM To: Michael Graham; [email protected] Subject: Re: [funsec] Rethinking FUNSEC I don't have a column anymore. Nowadays I copy funsec and paste it into Word and sell it as white papers to vendors. Larry Seltzer Contributing Editor, PC Magazine [email protected] http://blogs.pcmag.com/securitywatch/ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael Graham Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 3:54 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [funsec] Rethinking FUNSEC Ya if someone were to publicize funsec, what the hell would larry have left for his column? Sorry but this material has already been commercialized please find other. On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Larry Seltzer <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Chill Barry. Everyone back to work. Nothing to see here. Larry Seltzer Contributing Editor, PC Magazine [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://blogs.pcmag.com/securitywatch/ -----Original Message----- From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Barry Raveendran Greene Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 2:53 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [funsec] Rethinking FUNSEC Hi Team, IMHO, the garbage in the press are influencing policy makers in governments and corporations to the wrong conclusions. Conclusions which lead to actions which is not addressing the reality of the threats. This is now not something to be laughed at, but something which is hurting the industry. I'm already started to tear into articles which as flawed, not researched, and garbage. I will continue to do that. But we have another option - take the FUNSEC dialog public. This is not opening the list, this is taking these conversations - which deal with critiquing press articles - public and searchable. Thoughts? Barry _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list. _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list. Click here<https://www.mailcontrol.com/sr/wQw0zmjPoHdJTZGyOCrrhg==> to report this email as spam. Protected by Websense Hosted Email Security -- www.websense.com
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
