> ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 08:17:47 -0500 > From: "Larry Seltzer" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [funsec] Was the ClimateGate Hacker Justified? Join the > Debate! > To: "Gadi Evron" <[email protected]>, "funsec" <[email protected]> > Message-ID: > <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > I'll take a stab at actually answering the question: > > Yes, absolutely it was justified to leak these e-mails because the > implications of this issue are huge for the economy and the livelihood > of millions. > > Some people may think that the science is settled and any questions are > trivia but not everyone thinks that way and there are experts in the > field among them. We read of these experts and efforts to suppress their > opinions in the e-mails and we read of efforts to cook the data in them. > > > We're being asked to impose what are, in effect, huge taxes on the > economy with this science given as a justification. We're entitled to a > full examination of the science and how it was approached and these > e-mails are revealing in that regard. > > Larry Seltzer > Contributing Editor, PC Magazine > [email protected] > http://blogs.pcmag.com/securitywatch/ > > PS - If you haven't guessed it already, I think that climate science is > largely full of crap. Put aside for the minute that the models can't > explain why we've had *cooling* for the last 10 years; why would you > think that you can look at ice cores and use them to recreate > temperatures to within fractions of a degree? You can only prove the > accuracy of such methods by comparing them with actual temperatures and, > of course, we can't do that. I've had the sense for a long time that > these guys know a whole lot less about this stuff than they claim to. > > > > ------------------------------
Gosh Larry, that makes you "subhuman" > I look down with contempt on the inferior creatures who are dumb enough to > fall for this denialist nonsense. They belong with the creationists, the > flat-earthers, and other subhuman primates who lack the intelligence required > for classication as "homo sapiens". Perhaps they should consult their > horoscopes, or have their fortunes read, or worship their laughable gods, > instead of concerning themselves with matters far beyond their pitifully > feeble intellects. > > ---Rsk -- been great, thanks a.k.a System _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
