> > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:06:42 -0500 (EST) > From: der Mouse <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [funsec] Ghosts of steganography past > To: [email protected] > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > >> I want to know if people are still using primitive methods of hiding > >> information > > > http://s169.photobucket.com/albums/u210/noodles-1991/?action=view¤t=1159390191021.jpg&newest=1 > > (Go ahead - *try* to claim that's not really primitive stego. ;) > > I sure don't see any hidden message in it. What am I missing? > > Or is it just so effective it's defeated my attempts to find it? > > /~\ The ASCII Mouse > \ / Ribbon Campaign > X Against HTML [email protected] > / \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B > > > ------------------------------ > > This is one of those motivational posters. Stenography - FAILED
Cant you all see that? Sheesh. -- been great, thanks a.k.a System
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
