Another point about the CJR article is that it claims there's a big difference between the Pentagon Papers and the East Anglia e-mails because the latter aren't government documents. This is sophistry. Those e-mails concern research which is heavily government-funded and which is driving significant matters of public policy concern. There's no good reason to draw a distinction between the cases.
Larry Seltzer Contributing Editor, PC Magazine [email protected] http://blogs.pcmag.com/securitywatch/ _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
