>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 18:44:18 +0100
> From: Dan Kaminsky <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [funsec] Image forensics
> To: "Dr. Neal Krawetz" <[email protected]>
> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain;       charset=us-ascii;       format=flowed;
>  delsp=yes
>
> [snip]
>


> What I would like to do is actually give you the hundred images as
> described, and receive:
>
> A) The raw output from your tool (identical settings for all files --
> if you need multiple settings, multiply them out across all files).
> B) Your interpretation of the output
>
> I will then unmask the originals, and changes, and we can calculate
> the relative effectiveness of your various approaches.
>
> I've always liked your work, Neal. I mean that, I was a graphics geek
> before I was a security geek, and you've done amazing work at the
> intersection.  I just think some numbers would make it infinitely
> stronger.
>
> What do you think?
>
>
> On Dec 28, 2009, at 6:13 PM, "Dr. Neal Krawetz" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>
I would sign up for another list to learn more of this work. This is just
damn good stuff. Period. I too started out as a graphic artist and begin the
study of stenography and such back in early 90's and that brought me to
computer security. Please share more!
-- 
been great, thanks
RandyM
a.k.a System
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.

Reply via email to