Dan Kaminsky wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Blue Boar <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Dan Kaminsky wrote:
>>> Obscurity is not secrecy.
>> They're the same thing, just different degrees.
>>
> 
> Used to think the same, actually.  But if you look at what obscurity
> is always used to refer, it's "this ordered system has *so much
> structure* nobody could ever figure it all out".  That's a very
> different argumentory path than "there is nothing to figure out, they
> simply mathematically have to know this secret or brute force".

You have chosen "I elect to play by attempting a definition for which
there can be no agreement."

Your question: What's the difference between secret and obscure? Could
you quantify this, say, with a particular number of bits of entropy?

                                                BB
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.

Reply via email to