I think it can be a good thing. I would like to see some sort of requirement that before disconnecting a user the ISP provides the user with adequate information on how/where to resolve the issue rather than just a notification of immanent service termination. I also think that if Federal law is going to require this they need to couple it with a decent information campaign with plenty of ways for users to have questions answered.
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Thomas Raef <[email protected]>wrote: > I read this on Slashdot: > > > > > http://tech.slashdot.org/story/10/01/25/1458231/Australian-ISPs-To-Disconnect-Botnet-Zombies?from=rss&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Slashdot%2Fslashdot+%28Slashdot%29 > > > > Do you think this is good? Or bad? A step in right direction – maybe. > > > > Please share your thoughts. > > > > Thomas J. Raef > > e-Based Security <http://www.ebasedsecurity.com/> > > "You're either hardened or you're hacked!" > > We Watch Your Website <http://www.wewatchyourwebsite.com/> > > "We Watch Your Website - so you don't have to." > > > > _______________________________________________ > Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. > https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec > Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list. >
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
