On 2/16/10 11:42 PM, Reed Loden wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 19:14:06 +0200
> Gadi Evron<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> By letter of the law or not, this *Feels* wrong. So I am hopeful Mozilla
>> will do something about it. However, I can't really blame them if they
>> can't.
>
> Good news!
>
> The affected version of FlashGot has been removed from the public view
> on AMO, and AMO admins are engaging in conversations with both the
> add-on author and Surf Canyon about this issue.
Thanks! That is good news indeed. I appreciate the help you guys have given.
I can't help but wonder if people won't stay stuck with the last version
as they won't want to upgrade to a new one which "installs unwanted
features" while they have it regardless.
Gadi.
>
> ~reed
> Mozilla Security Group
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
> https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
> Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
--
Gadi Evron,
[email protected].
Blog: http://gevron.livejournal.com/
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
