Covered at
http://blogs.csoonline.com/1179/chile_nic_explains_great_firewall_incident

too.

Juha-Matti

Dan Kaminsky [[email protected]] kirjoitti: 
> > Regarding the latter, just because a client receives an "incorrect
> > answer" doesn't necessarily mean it's what the server ("i-root") was
> > transmitting.
> >
> >
> Ah.  Yes, this is _very_ true.  Any point along the network path could have
> been hijacking or corrupting i-root traffic.  Heck, with sufficiently
> malicious BGP traffic, the attacker wouldn't even need to be on path.
> 
> I think I'm simply going to reserve all judgement until the post-mortem.
>
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.

Reply via email to