And a smaller subset of it is Apple's AT&T customers. I've seen the code they used to get the numbers, and it wasn't complicated at all.
Sometimes the simplest attacks are the easiest to pull off. 3:45 PM, on Jun 10, 2010, wrote: > Yeah, especially when Apple itself was not the target. Apple's customers were. > > Juha-Matti > > Joel Esler [[email protected]] kirjoitti: >> My only problem with the article is the inaccuracy of the headline. Gawker >> is known for their sensationalism. Frustratingly awesome. >> >> >> 11:20 AM, on Jun 10, 2010, wrote: >> >>> So I fall somewhere in the "yes, this really is a big deal," and don't mind >>> Gawker blasting it out public like this. I don't think it undermines the >>> message of data security. >> >> -- >> Joel Esler >> http://www.joelesler.net > > _______________________________________________ > Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. > https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec > Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list. -- Joel Esler http://www.joelesler.net _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
