There is no possible way this could potentially go wrong, right? http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/ns_tic.pdf
Doesn't the phrase "Identity Ecosystem" make you feel all warm and "green"? It's a public/private partnership, right? So there is no possibility of some large corporation taking over the process and imposing *their* management ideas on it? Like, say, trying to re-introduce the TCPI? And there couldn't possibly be any problem that an identity management system is being run out of the US, which has no privacy legislation? The fact that any PKI has to be complete, and locked down, couldn't affect the outcome, could it? There isn't any possible need for anyone (who wasn't a vile criminal) to be anonymous, is there? ====================== [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] "If you do buy a computer, don't turn it on." - Richards' 2nd Law ============= for back issues: [Base URL] site http://victoria.tc.ca/techrev/ CISSP refs: [Base URL]mnbksccd.htm Security Dict.: [Base URL]secgloss.htm Book reviews: [Base URL]mnbk.htm [Base URL]review.htm Partial/recent: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/techbooks/ Review mailing list: send mail to [email protected] http://blogs.securiteam.com/index.php/archives/author/p1/ http://blog.isc2.org/isc2_blog/slade/index.html http://twitter.com/rslade _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
