On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 7:36 PM, Tomas L. Byrnes <[email protected]> wrote: > .... > I strongly disagree. Since the vector of source attack against most CI > is from the "great unwashed" protecting the "great unwashed" from being > turned into zombies, or at least, if they are zombies, from being > controlled, is a major public benefit.
cite your sources. we're talking warfare against critical infrastructure here, not cyber crime or security theater. "i can use a single keystroke to take down the grid and collapse civilization!" you're never going to secure the great unwashed.* i challenge you to cites sources justifying your assertions! > There's even a patent app on it, owned by AT&T: USPTO app 20060031575 i'm more a fan of their mobile telco on a truck kits. to each their own... (you can mitigate a flood with some smart switches, but no logic can repair a modest synchronized DWDM outage nor match its practical impact.) * i reserve the right to re-evaluate this statement of truth after the 32bit time_t debacle in 2038. until then this is a conservative assessment. _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
