On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 3:46 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 14:52:54 CDT, RandallM said: > >> I used the word "smuck" in reference to one who is taken advantage of. Sir. > > Ahem. > >> > in India that some poorly paid smuck is "multitasking" with "Dell >> > support calls", "Clickjacking work" and doing some "desktop >> > publishing" jobs for some graphics company here all of his 14 hr day >> > at the office. > > If the "smuck" is multitasking and doing all that, he's taking advantage, not > being taken advantage of. >
true...unless he is just the "worker" there. Which I suspect is a case for a lot of the shops...we outsource to such shops and hear of the long hours and working conditions. Hell..they sent a rep here to get some stuff corrected on there end the poor girls husband DIED the night before she was to come here...they "allowed" her to return to "bury" him. True story. -- been great, thanks RandyM a.k.a System _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
