Usenet? How quaint. On Sep 6, 2010, at 8:48 AM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> Hi All, > > What's the deal with searching for sci.crypt usenet group? > > I used a popular text based search engine to locate the group using > the search "sci.crypt". The results were: > * sci.crypt.random-numbers > * sci.crypt.research > * 4 more > > Upon expanding "4 more", the next result was: > Science and Cryptography [email protected] > To be a suitable replacement for sci.crypt. > 12 members > > The *last* result was the group sci.crypt. > > Why in the world would anyone want to use a 12-member "suitable > replacement" named "Science and Cryptography" when a group with deep > usenet tradition exists? Is this more SEO bullshit? Or just search > provider bullshit? > > Jeff > _______________________________________________ > Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. > https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec > Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list. _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
