Rob Slade wrote: > We've had "naughty words" filters forever. We've had egress filtering (even > though most people don't use it). So tell me how this combination is not > completely obvious, and therefore patentable?
There was no link to the actual patent and I can't be bothered searching for it, but perhaps its a "process patent" where they effectively patent their specific implementation, rather than a patent claiming to cover the "basic invention" itself? Regards, Nick FitzGerald _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
