Date sent: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 14:26:26 -0500 From: Brance Amussen <[email protected]>
> The TSA may not have caught any terrorists, but they are doing their part to > catch bowel diseases early... > > http://www.dailysquib.co.uk/?c=123&a=2539 I recall someone doing a piece on the TSA's legal liabilities getting complicated with regard to these type of areas. Are they responsible for detecting skin lesion conditions they can see and maybe the traveller doesn't yet know about? What about other conditions? If they get much more intrusive, pregnancies are one specific area of definite concern. What if they find out a woman is pregnant and don't tell her before she gets scanned again? Are they responsible for damages for "loss of joyous surprise" if they let slip whether it's a boy or a girl? And, if the mother is aware of the pregnancy but the husband is not, is TSA responsible for the costs of the divorce? ====================== (quote inserted randomly by Pegasus Mailer) [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Green: I ... I just want to be truthful. Stewart: Perception of legitimacy is more important than legitimacy itself. That's the greater truth. Don't fuck with our democracy. Don't undermine our way of life. Every American believes their vote counts. Now you wanna tell them that's not true? Green: But the results of the election will be wrong! One candidate will win because of computer error. `Man of the Year' http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0483726/quotes victoria.tc.ca/techrev/rms.htm blog.isc2.org/isc2_blog/slade/index.html http://blogs.securiteam.com/index.php/archives/author/p1/ http://www.infosecbc.org/links http://twitter.com/rslade _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
