Ok chrome has sandboxing, but does anyone know of any published tests about it's efficacy?
Cheers, Randy Typos courtesy of Blackberry ----- Original Message ----- From: Larry Seltzer [mailto:la...@larryseltzer.com] Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 04:58 PM To: Joel Esler <joel.es...@me.com> Cc: funsec@linuxbox.org <funsec@linuxbox.org>; rmsl...@shaw.ca <rmsl...@shaw.ca> Subject: Re: [funsec] Firefox slow? >>Chrome has it's own security problems. (a lot of them). While I agree it's a freaking fast browser, I'm still on Safari. Chrome is sandboxed. Very, very few of the vulnerabilities in it are exploitable in a meaningful way. In fact, the critical vulnerability they reported yesterday (http://blogs.pcmag.com/securitywatch/2011/01/new_chrome_version_includes_ cr.php) is actually not exploitable because it's not in live code. I'd send you the list of critical vulnerabilities in Safari, but I'm afraid Verizon will start throttling my account for excessive bandwidth usage. LJS _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list. _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
