Paul, You write
"Denial of service is not merely a peaceful protest meant to garner attention for a cause. Denial of service is forcible and it is injurious. It is not like any form of civil disobedience, but rather it is criminal behaviour more like looting. " But is it really? If I loot your shop, I now possess something that rightfully should belong to you. DoS isn't entirely like this. How is DoS different from shutting down business at a brick-and-mortar location by holding a big rally? They're both "forcible" and "injurious." People are often arrested at these G20 protests, but they're generally later released or charged with a misdemeanor. The consequences of those arrests are much less severe than in the case of DoS attacks. In fact, the consequences of those protests seem much more severe than a DDoS attack. I was in Toronto last summer and the city's center was essentially shut down both in anticipation of the G20 protests, and then moreso when the protests actually happened. Anyhow, I'd be interested in seeing you expand on this a little more, as I think it's an interesting question. Bob > From: Paul Vixie <vi...@vix.com> > To: <funsec@linuxbox.org> > Date: 02/13/2011 06:53 AM > Subject: Re: [funsec] Anonymous not freedom fighters > Sent by: <funsec-boun...@linuxbox.org> > > randa...@fidmail.com (RandallM) writes: > > > Anonymous are not Pro rights of speech or Wikileaks but are pure web > > terrorist in my book. They hurt the cause of the pro right to free press > > and speech > > ... > > http://www.redbarn.org/blogs/vixie/rule > -- > Paul Vixie > KI6YSY > _______________________________________________ > Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. > https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec > Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
