On 4/11/11 7:20 PM, Paul Ferguson wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 5:19 PM, security curmudgeon
> <[email protected]>  wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Paul Ferguson wrote:
>>
>> : On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon&
>> : Hannah<[email protected]>  wrote:
>> :
>> :>  APT relativity is such that for any attacker there exists a victim for 
>> whom the
>> :>  attacker is more advanced and/or persistent
>> :>
>> :>  https://twitter.com/#!/imaguid/status/57522111857700864
>> :
>> : Ha! I like that one.
>> :
>> : Generally I hate the term "APT" because the definition of "Advanced" is
>> : misleading.
>>
>> As is "persistent".. sending a couple PDFs to employees over a one day
>> period got the foot in the door of RSA. That is not "persistent" as far as
>> anything I have seen or done.
>>
>
> Yes, but it *is* persistent as we have seen these same targeted,
> socially-engineered attacks for years now.
>
> - ferg
>

So, repeating the same message over and over again may eventually
build up an undeserved perception of trust?

It'll never work.

Randy
          _---_
        / _---_ \
       | |     | |
       |_|-----|_|
     /             \
    |      ( )      |
    |      | |      |
    |      |_|      |
     \_____________/

  This lock means you can
    trust me with your
      credit card


_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.

Reply via email to