> i agree for a reason not mentioned yet. blackholing by source IP > hasn't worked for years
Works for me. Indeed, one of today's better tools (Spamhaus's Zen list) works exactly that way. > since so much spam is mixed in with non-spam from addresses like the > gmail and hotmail and aol servers which for business reasons noone is > comfortable blackholing. the spammers won this round in 2002 or so. Only for people who are willing to let them human-shields their way out of the consequences of their antisocial behaviour. Such people deserve all the spam consequences of such willingness. > also, the absence of a PTR RR or its presence having a specific > pattern is a better input to the filter than the recent reputation of > the ip address. "X is better than Y" is not a reason to avoid using Y, not unless for some reason you can't do both. (Which may indeed be so for some people, for example if you don't have the staff time to maintain both.) /~\ The ASCII Mouse \ / Ribbon Campaign X Against HTML [email protected] / \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
