Stuxnet was 20 times more powerful than a typical computer virus? That 
sounds very powerful. I'm now 20 times more worried.

Bob

<[email protected]> wrote on 06/09/2011 12:02:07 PM:

> From: "Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Date: 06/09/2011 11:33 AM
> Subject: [funsec] Stuxnet "infovideo" by Hungry Beast
> Sent by: <[email protected]>
> 
> (for very, very small values of "info")
> 
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7g0pi4J8auQ
> 
> Good production values used to display a few facts, buried in a mass
> of misleading 
> hype.
> 
> Actually, I suppose none of the material is untrue, its just that 
> the presentation, 
> overall, leaves a very false impression.
> 
> ======================  (quote inserted randomly by Pegasus Mailer)
> [email protected]     [email protected]     [email protected]
> The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men
>    to do nothing.             - Edmund Burke
> victoria.tc.ca/techrev/rms.htm http://www.infosecbc.org/links
> http://blogs.securiteam.com/index.php/archives/author/p1/
> http://twitter.com/rslade
> _______________________________________________
> Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
> https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
> Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.

Reply via email to