See also: http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/11/gmail-location-data-petraeus/
- ferg On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 12:17 PM, phester <fun...@armorfirewall.com> wrote: > > On Mon, 12 Nov 2012, Rich Kulawiec wrote: > >> Upon further review...and since this is *funsec*, I'd like to ask a >> few rhetorical security questions about this. I'm sure there are >> more that haven't occurred to me yet. >> >> 1. How is it that the Director of the CIA does not know how to use >> email (relatively) securely? Did he really compose unencrypted messages >> to his paramour using CIA computers on the CIA network and send them >> via CIA mail servers? Really? REALLY? > > > He used gmail, from cia gear. Thousands of mails over a period of months. > > >> 4. If the internal mechanisms of government aren't sufficient to (quickly) >> catch a very very senior person having an affair -- and doing it >> incompetently -- then why should we believe that they're sufficient to >> catch a well-trained, careful, diligent spy? > > > By reading their personal mails? Should this be done by an algorithm, or > live person? > > > _______________________________________________ > Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. > https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec > Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list. -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson fergdawgster(at)gmail.com _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
