LOL! It's funny because it's true! :-) Michael P. Blanchard Principal Security Engineer, CISSP, GCIH, CCSA-NGX, MCSE Cyber Security Services EMC ² Corporation 32 Coslin Drive Southboro, MA 01772
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2013 12:08 PM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: [funsec] Friday social engineering http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304403804579264272004 583860 "When women are present or when men are prompted to think about women, they act differently, research shows." "Sex-related cues like these have been found to make men more prone to take risks while playing blackjack, to discount the future when making economic decisions and to spend on conspicuous luxury items (but not on mundane expenses). Typically, the effects are strongest in single men. By contrast, these studies uniformly report that cues about males have no such effects on women." Male infosec professionals: don't think about woman when planning. Female infosec professionals: you can think about anything you want. ====================== (quote inserted randomly by Pegasus Mailer) [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] What's most interesting about these ciphers is how robustly lousy they are. - Bruce Schneier (on the GSM cryptographic algorithms) victoria.tc.ca/techrev/rms.htm http://www.infosecbc.org/links http://blogs.securiteam.com/index.php/archives/author/p1/ http://twitter.com/rslade _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list. _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
